Starting point: As a general guide, the tenant is entitled to a rental agreement on existing terms, although he is open to any party to request a waiver from these conditions. The onus of persuading the court to impose a change against the will of one of the parties rests with the party proposing the change, and any change must be fair and reasonable and take into account the relatively weak bargaining position of a sedentary tenant. The court will also consider all necessary changes to reflect the fact that the new lease is much shorter than the current lease (for example. B responsibility for repairs). There is no reason why the court should not be able to take into account changes in the market standard, regardless of which party they are acting in favour of; The update is often in the interest of both parties, and an opportunity to improve the lease should not be missed simply to maintain the same conditions. For example, it is increasingly common to include provisions dealing with what happens when the property is damaged by an uninsured risk or an obligation for the lessor to obtain insurance against terrorist risks (and to pay for the tenant). If the current lease does not contain these provisions, they could be included. Well, the usual principles of leasing apply for the lease to be formally agreed with the appropriate signatures and dates, not only for the lease agreement in general, but the “exclusion clause” above added a date for the concluded declaration. When a rental of commercial premises is not guaranteed by Tenure, a tenant must know that at the end of the authorized period, he may be invited to leave without compensation, even if the exit of the premises means that his company loses his will to do business and that he must bear the costs of moving to new premises.
“If the lessor and tenant accept the tenant of a later tenancy agreement or operation with other land on conditions and from a date specified in the contract, the current tenancy agreement remains until that date, but it is no longer, and it is not a lease agreement to which this part of the law applies.” However, it is highly unlikely that the courts will accept the inclusion of conditions against the will of one of the parties if they deviate from the underlying terms of sale contained in the previous lease and alter the balance of commercial negotiations between the parties. The tenant must then formally respond to this “warning” and accept that all rights be excluded from the tenancy agreement.